Strategies for Professional Growth Quiz 1: 26 February 2023, Set 1 (January 2023 term)

THIS IS QUESTION PAPER FOR THE SUBJECT "DEGREE LEVEL : STRATEGIES FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH" ARE YOU SURE YOU HAVE TO WRITE EXAM FOR THIS SUBJECT? CROSS CHECK YOUR HALL TICKET TO CONFIRM THE SUBJECTS TO BE WRITTEN. (IF IT IS NOT THE CORRECT SUBJECT, PLS CHECK THE SECTION AT THE TOP FOR THE SUBJECTS REGISTERED BY YOU)

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Laura is the Associate Director of a non-profit agency that provides assistance to children and families. She is the head of a department that focuses on evaluating the skill-building programs the agency provides to families. She reports directly to the agency leadership. As a whole, the agency has been cautious in hiring this year because of increased competition for federal grant funding. However, they have also suffered high staff turnover. Two directors have left as well as three key research staff and one staff person from the finance department. Laura has a demanding schedule that requires frequent travel; however, she supervises two managers who in turn are responsible for five staff members each. Both managers have been appointed within the last six months. Manager 1: Kelly has a specific background in research. She manages staff who provide research support to another department that delivers behavioural health services to youth. Kelly supports her staff and is very organized; however, she often takes a very black-and-white view of issues. Upper-level leadership values Kelly’s latest research on the therapeutic division’s services. Kelly is very motivated and driven and expects the same from her staff. Manager 2: Linda has a strong background in social science research and evaluation. She manages staff that work on different projects within the agency. She is known as a problem solver and is extremely supportive of her staff. She is very organized and has a wealth of experience in the evaluation of family services. Linda is very capable and can sometimes take on too much. The managers are sensing that staff are becoming overworked as everyone takes on increased responsibilities due to high staff turnover. Staff have also mentioned that Laura’s “glass half-empty” conversation style leaves them feeling dejected. In addition, Laura has not shared budgets with her managers, so they are having difficulty appropriately allocating work to staff. Laura said she has not received sufficient information from the finance department to complete the budgets. The finance department said they have sent her all the information they have available. As staff become distressed, the managers are becoming frustrated. They feel like they are unable to advocate for their staff or problem-solve without key information like the departmental budget.

How can Laura most effectively use both management and leadership skills in her role as associate director?

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Laura is the Associate Director of a non-profit agency that provides assistance to children and families. She is the head of a department that focuses on evaluating the skill-building programs the agency provides to families. She reports directly to the agency leadership. As a whole, the agency has been cautious in hiring this year because of increased competition for federal grant funding. However, they have also suffered high staff turnover. Two directors have left as well as three key research staff and one staff person from the finance department. Laura has a demanding schedule that requires frequent travel; however, she supervises two managers who in turn are responsible for five staff members each. Both managers have been appointed within the last six months. Manager 1: Kelly has a specific background in research. She manages staff who provide research support to another department that delivers behavioural health services to youth. Kelly supports her staff and is very organized; however, she often takes a very black-and-white view of issues. Upper-level leadership values Kelly’s latest research on the therapeutic division’s services. Kelly is very motivated and driven and expects the same from her staff. Manager 2: Linda has a strong background in social science research and evaluation. She manages staff that work on different projects within the agency. She is known as a problem solver and is extremely supportive of her staff. She is very organized and has a wealth of experience in the evaluation of family services. Linda is very capable and can sometimes take on too much. The managers are sensing that staff are becoming overworked as everyone takes on increased responsibilities due to high staff turnover. Staff have also mentioned that Laura’s “glass half-empty” conversation style leaves them feeling dejected. In addition, Laura has not shared budgets with her managers, so they are having difficulty appropriately allocating work to staff. Laura said she has not received sufficient information from the finance department to complete the budgets. The finance department said they have sent her all the information they have available. As staff become distressed, the managers are becoming frustrated. They feel like they are unable to advocate for their staff or problem-solve without key information like the departmental budget.

What steps could be taken to build staff confidence?

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Laura is the Associate Director of a non-profit agency that provides assistance to children and families. She is the head of a department that focuses on evaluating the skill-building programs the agency provides to families. She reports directly to the agency leadership. As a whole, the agency has been cautious in hiring this year because of increased competition for federal grant funding. However, they have also suffered high staff turnover. Two directors have left as well as three key research staff and one staff person from the finance department. Laura has a demanding schedule that requires frequent travel; however, she supervises two managers who in turn are responsible for five staff members each. Both managers have been appointed within the last six months. Manager 1: Kelly has a specific background in research. She manages staff who provide research support to another department that delivers behavioural health services to youth. Kelly supports her staff and is very organized; however, she often takes a very black-and-white view of issues. Upper-level leadership values Kelly’s latest research on the therapeutic division’s services. Kelly is very motivated and driven and expects the same from her staff. Manager 2: Linda has a strong background in social science research and evaluation. She manages staff that work on different projects within the agency. She is known as a problem solver and is extremely supportive of her staff. She is very organized and has a wealth of experience in the evaluation of family services. Linda is very capable and can sometimes take on too much. The managers are sensing that staff are becoming overworked as everyone takes on increased responsibilities due to high staff turnover. Staff have also mentioned that Laura’s “glass half-empty” conversation style leaves them feeling dejected. In addition, Laura has not shared budgets with her managers, so they are having difficulty appropriately allocating work to staff. Laura said she has not received sufficient information from the finance department to complete the budgets. The finance department said they have sent her all the information they have available. As staff become distressed, the managers are becoming frustrated. They feel like they are unable to advocate for their staff or problem-solve without key information like the departmental budget.

Based on the information provided in the case, what can be concluded about the state of communication in the organization?

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Laura is the Associate Director of a non-profit agency that provides assistance to children and families. She is the head of a department that focuses on evaluating the skill-building programs the agency provides to families. She reports directly to the agency leadership. As a whole, the agency has been cautious in hiring this year because of increased competition for federal grant funding. However, they have also suffered high staff turnover. Two directors have left as well as three key research staff and one staff person from the finance department. Laura has a demanding schedule that requires frequent travel; however, she supervises two managers who in turn are responsible for five staff members each. Both managers have been appointed within the last six months. Manager 1: Kelly has a specific background in research. She manages staff who provide research support to another department that delivers behavioural health services to youth. Kelly supports her staff and is very organized; however, she often takes a very black-and-white view of issues. Upper-level leadership values Kelly’s latest research on the therapeutic division’s services. Kelly is very motivated and driven and expects the same from her staff. Manager 2: Linda has a strong background in social science research and evaluation. She manages staff that work on different projects within the agency. She is known as a problem solver and is extremely supportive of her staff. She is very organized and has a wealth of experience in the evaluation of family services. Linda is very capable and can sometimes take on too much. The managers are sensing that staff are becoming overworked as everyone takes on increased responsibilities due to high staff turnover. Staff have also mentioned that Laura’s “glass half-empty” conversation style leaves them feeling dejected. In addition, Laura has not shared budgets with her managers, so they are having difficulty appropriately allocating work to staff. Laura said she has not received sufficient information from the finance department to complete the budgets. The finance department said they have sent her all the information they have available. As staff become distressed, the managers are becoming frustrated. They feel like they are unable to advocate for their staff or problem-solve without key information like the departmental budget.

Which of the following best describes the current state of teamwork, collaboration, and coordination within the organization described in the case?

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Laura is the Associate Director of a non-profit agency that provides assistance to children and families. She is the head of a department that focuses on evaluating the skill-building programs the agency provides to families. She reports directly to the agency leadership. As a whole, the agency has been cautious in hiring this year because of increased competition for federal grant funding. However, they have also suffered high staff turnover. Two directors have left as well as three key research staff and one staff person from the finance department. Laura has a demanding schedule that requires frequent travel; however, she supervises two managers who in turn are responsible for five staff members each. Both managers have been appointed within the last six months. Manager 1: Kelly has a specific background in research. She manages staff who provide research support to another department that delivers behavioural health services to youth. Kelly supports her staff and is very organized; however, she often takes a very black-and-white view of issues. Upper-level leadership values Kelly’s latest research on the therapeutic division’s services. Kelly is very motivated and driven and expects the same from her staff. Manager 2: Linda has a strong background in social science research and evaluation. She manages staff that work on different projects within the agency. She is known as a problem solver and is extremely supportive of her staff. She is very organized and has a wealth of experience in the evaluation of family services. Linda is very capable and can sometimes take on too much. The managers are sensing that staff are becoming overworked as everyone takes on increased responsibilities due to high staff turnover. Staff have also mentioned that Laura’s “glass half-empty” conversation style leaves them feeling dejected. In addition, Laura has not shared budgets with her managers, so they are having difficulty appropriately allocating work to staff. Laura said she has not received sufficient information from the finance department to complete the budgets. The finance department said they have sent her all the information they have available. As staff become distressed, the managers are becoming frustrated. They feel like they are unable to advocate for their staff or problem-solve without key information like the departmental budget.

Which of the following would you suggest as advice to Laura on improving her leadership skills, based on the information provided in the case?

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Negative Aspects of Collaboration? Teams can perform well or poorly, which leaves an overriding question: Are collaboration's negative aspects so severe that we should avoid making decisions and working in teams? Groups and teams need more time to process multiple pieces of information and coordinate what they know. Daniel Kahneman (Israeli-American psychologist, who was awarded the 2002 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences) and colleagues also warn that when committees and groups make recommendations, they’ve often “fallen in love” with a particular idea and are no longer thinking rationally. These problems of biases can be magnified when a team of people are making a decision collectively. Look no further than the U.S. Congress in recent years to see instances where a group decision-making process might lead to a worse outcome than if one consistent course of action were pursued. So what can be done to minimize these biases? The problems of coordination and collaboration suggest that we should invoke team decision-making only when it appears that pooling information will lead to better decisions than individual decision-making. Experts advise that decision-makers receiving advice from teams should always ask whether the team’s recommendations contain any self-interested biases. It’s also important to see whether the team has developed an emotional attachment to one course of action or has succumbed to groupthink. Finally, run down a checklist of the heuristics and biases related to group shifts and groupthink to see whether the group might be prone to making these decision errors.

What is a potential negative aspect of teamwork that should be considered before making a decision?

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Negative Aspects of Collaboration? Teams can perform well or poorly, which leaves an overriding question: Are collaboration's negative aspects so severe that we should avoid making decisions and working in teams? Groups and teams need more time to process multiple pieces of information and coordinate what they know. Daniel Kahneman (Israeli-American psychologist, who was awarded the 2002 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences) and colleagues also warn that when committees and groups make recommendations, they’ve often “fallen in love” with a particular idea and are no longer thinking rationally. These problems of biases can be magnified when a team of people are making a decision collectively. Look no further than the U.S. Congress in recent years to see instances where a group decision-making process might lead to a worse outcome than if one consistent course of action were pursued. So what can be done to minimize these biases? The problems of coordination and collaboration suggest that we should invoke team decision-making only when it appears that pooling information will lead to better decisions than individual decision-making. Experts advise that decision-makers receiving advice from teams should always ask whether the team’s recommendations contain any self-interested biases. It’s also important to see whether the team has developed an emotional attachment to one course of action or has succumbed to groupthink. Finally, run down a checklist of the heuristics and biases related to group shifts and groupthink to see whether the group might be prone to making these decision errors.

Based on the information provided in the case, which of the following is an overriding factor to be considered by the decision maker?

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Negative Aspects of Collaboration? Teams can perform well or poorly, which leaves an overriding question: Are collaboration's negative aspects so severe that we should avoid making decisions and working in teams? Groups and teams need more time to process multiple pieces of information and coordinate what they know. Daniel Kahneman (Israeli-American psychologist, who was awarded the 2002 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences) and colleagues also warn that when committees and groups make recommendations, they’ve often “fallen in love” with a particular idea and are no longer thinking rationally. These problems of biases can be magnified when a team of people are making a decision collectively. Look no further than the U.S. Congress in recent years to see instances where a group decision-making process might lead to a worse outcome than if one consistent course of action were pursued. So what can be done to minimize these biases? The problems of coordination and collaboration suggest that we should invoke team decision-making only when it appears that pooling information will lead to better decisions than individual decision-making. Experts advise that decision-makers receiving advice from teams should always ask whether the team’s recommendations contain any self-interested biases. It’s also important to see whether the team has developed an emotional attachment to one course of action or has succumbed to groupthink. Finally, run down a checklist of the heuristics and biases related to group shifts and groupthink to see whether the group might be prone to making these decision errors.

Consider the following:

Consider the following: Which of the “Scenario” depicted above aptly match the “Challenges” mentioned against each?

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Negative Aspects of Collaboration? Teams can perform well or poorly, which leaves an overriding question: Are collaboration's negative aspects so severe that we should avoid making decisions and working in teams? Groups and teams need more time to process multiple pieces of information and coordinate what they know. Daniel Kahneman (Israeli-American psychologist, who was awarded the 2002 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences) and colleagues also warn that when committees and groups make recommendations, they’ve often “fallen in love” with a particular idea and are no longer thinking rationally. These problems of biases can be magnified when a team of people are making a decision collectively. Look no further than the U.S. Congress in recent years to see instances where a group decision-making process might lead to a worse outcome than if one consistent course of action were pursued. So what can be done to minimize these biases? The problems of coordination and collaboration suggest that we should invoke team decision-making only when it appears that pooling information will lead to better decisions than individual decision-making. Experts advise that decision-makers receiving advice from teams should always ask whether the team’s recommendations contain any self-interested biases. It’s also important to see whether the team has developed an emotional attachment to one course of action or has succumbed to groupthink. Finally, run down a checklist of the heuristics and biases related to group shifts and groupthink to see whether the group might be prone to making these decision errors.

What is groupthink according to the case study?

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Negative Aspects of Collaboration? Teams can perform well or poorly, which leaves an overriding question: Are collaboration's negative aspects so severe that we should avoid making decisions and working in teams? Groups and teams need more time to process multiple pieces of information and coordinate what they know. Daniel Kahneman (Israeli-American psychologist, who was awarded the 2002 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences) and colleagues also warn that when committees and groups make recommendations, they’ve often “fallen in love” with a particular idea and are no longer thinking rationally. These problems of biases can be magnified when a team of people are making a decision collectively. Look no further than the U.S. Congress in recent years to see instances where a group decision-making process might lead to a worse outcome than if one consistent course of action were pursued. So what can be done to minimize these biases? The problems of coordination and collaboration suggest that we should invoke team decision-making only when it appears that pooling information will lead to better decisions than individual decision-making. Experts advise that decision-makers receiving advice from teams should always ask whether the team’s recommendations contain any self-interested biases. It’s also important to see whether the team has developed an emotional attachment to one course of action or has succumbed to groupthink. Finally, run down a checklist of the heuristics and biases related to group shifts and groupthink to see whether the group might be prone to making these decision errors.

What should be done to see whether the group might be prone to making decision errors according to the case study?

Read the case study, then answer the question Murat and Hayat were key members of a project team headed by Tuval. Murat was technically competent and understood the project requirements very well, but lacked self-confidence. Hayat, on the other hand, was very confident but lacked technical experience and expertise. As Tuval was required to take over another project immediately, Murat was selected as project leader, but Tuval continued to devote 20% of her time to this project. After 6 to 7 weeks of taking charge, Murat begins to feel that he requires some help with his leadership style as the project is getting behind schedule. Tuval decides to coach him using a collaborative style. Which of the following is the most appropriate approach?

Read the case study, then answer the question Nurit has worked very hard on developing an innovative new approach for carrying out a key project. This needs to be approved at a higher management level in the organization, but senior managers have so far given the idea no more than cursory attention. They have reluctantly agreed to Nurit's request for a meeting to discuss this matter. But Nurit has just found out that other agenda items have been subsequently included in that meeting so she is likely to get just 10 minutes to present her approach. She feels quite sure that senior managers don't feel inclined to change the existing methods, and are merely going through a ritual by making a short time allocation. She approaches you in an emotional and demoralized state. You have been her supervisor before. Though you work in a different part of the organization, she comes to you to be coached once in a while. What will you tell her?

Read the case study, then answer the question At LT Inc., the management team noticed a unique behaviour among their staff. Every morning, before the daily team meeting, all employees would gather in the conference room several minutes early. During this time, they would discuss various work-related issues, exchange ideas, and offer suggestions. Although there were no formal rules or guidelines regarding this pre-meeting routine, it was understood that participation was expected. One day, a new team member, Nikitha, joined the company and was unaware of this unwritten rule. On her first day, she arrived right on time for the daily meeting and was surprised to see her colleagues already engaged in deep conversations. Feeling left out, she approached the team manager, Uthaman Pradeep, for clarification. Uthaman Pradeep explained to Nikitha that this was a long-standing practice at LT Inc. and that everyone was expected to participate in the pre-meeting routine. Nikitha quickly adapted and became an active participant in the pre-meeting discussions. What aspect of communication that is followed within teams is best illustrated in the scenario at LT Inc.?

Read the case study, then answer the question Case Study: John is a sales manager who needs to deliver a presentation to potential clients to secure a large business deal. He is concerned about effectively delivering his message and engaging the audience. Question: What is the most effective way for John to prepare his presentation and improve his presentation skills?

Read the case study, then answer the question Scenario: The manager of a busy marketing department has assigned a complex project to one of her team members. The team member has been given the freedom to decide how to best approach the project and how to delegate tasks to other team members. Question: What type of leadership style is demonstrated in this scenario?

In October 2017, President Trump sought to deflect a news story reporting on links between his campaign and Russia by tweeting the following: “Who paid for it, Russia, the FBI or the Dems (or all)?” Trump attempted to diffuse the situation by

Which of the following is the most suitable option that defines the distinguishing feature of a team?

What issues must a manager/ leader address when considering the composition of the team?

As per Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences, intelligence includes:

Consider the following pairs: 1. Naturalistic Intelligence: Ability to recognize and understand the various patterns in nature 2. Spatial Intelligence: Capacity to perceive, understand and use visual information effectively 3. Intrapersonal Intelligence: Ability to understand others and social interactions 4. Interpersonal Intelligence: Ability to understand oneself and know one’s thoughts, emotions, feelings, motives and desires, and how these influence their behaviour. Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?

Julian Treasure studies sound and advises businesses on how best to use it. He has given the acronym RASA, which is the Sanskrit word for "juice" or "essence." Which one of the following expanded forms of the following acronyms is correct?

Which of the following can help us in improving our listening skills and can benefit us in academic, professional, and personal contexts? 1. Make eye contact; focus on the person speaking; don't answer your phone or look at your email. 2. Eavesdropping to find out confidential information. 3. Self-absorbed listening; shift the focus back to yourself. 4. Removing the filters such as prejudice and cultural bias. Select the correct answer using the code given below:

Which of the following statements best describes Kaizen?

Which of the following is not a Belbin Team Role?

Sensitivity to issues related to the meaning of life, death, and other aspects of human conditions refers to

What is the primary concept Stephen R. Covey emphasizes in "The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People" regarding the power of choice?

Asking "Could you give me an example of what you mean?" is an example of which of the following active listening skills?

What is a key aspect of emotional resilience that helps individuals regulate their emotions and respond effectively to challenges?

Which of the following behavioural patterns would not be a good idea for building good interpersonal relationships at the workplace?

With respect to spheres of responsibility, the elements that are outside your control and that may concern or affect or interest you indirectly, such as war, pandemic, and economy; fall under

With respect to spheres of responsibility, what is the sphere of influence defined as?

Which of the following can be classified as ‘information overload’ type barriers to communication?

Based on the information about the "Spirit of the Squirrel" in the book “Gung Ho!”: What is the primary motivation behind the squirrel's hard work of collecting seeds?

What is the primary focus of the "Gung Ho!" approach to management?

What are some factors that can contribute to communication misunderstandings? 1. Missing the details in the statement while communicating 2. Listening to or reading and understanding the statement incompletely 3. Verbiage Select the correct answer using the code given below:

Studies show that family physicians that listen well produce better outcomes. Listening improves diagnoses, helps doctors see the context of psychological and social issues affecting patient health, and may even help avoid a lawsuit. What advice would you give about listening?

Which of the following statement is incorrect about virtual teams?

According to Nick Morgan, which of the following is/ are regarded as a “second conversation”?

An effective team occurs when the members have ________________ and recognize that their personal success is dependent on the success of others.

Which of the following factors would contribute to ineffective teamwork?

What are some steps to improve professional writing? 1. Prepare the formal document without the need to persuade the target audience 2. Avoid the typical errors that are usually made while preparing a professional document. 3. Understand the purpose of formal writing 4. Recognize the overall structure of a formal document Select the correct answer using the code given below:

The possible order of points for describing the steps for doing something in sequence in a formal report is known as

Which of the following is correct with respect to hand gestures during apresentation?

Which of the following correctly describes an outline in the context of a presentation?

Consider the following statements regarding connecting with the audience during a presentation: 1. Repeat a summary slide from your previous presentation 2. Separate facts from opinions 3. Pause to enable decisions Which of the above statements is/are correct?

When defending an academic thesis, which of the following is necessary to include when using external sources in the thesis?

According to the lesson ‘Teamwork and Getting Along’, which of the following is an effective approach to allocating resources in a team project?

Which of the following is a characteristic of outbound training?

Consider the following statements regarding effective change management: 1. Change management is concerned with planning and initiating the change process at the organizational level only. 2. Empowering team members through training and development is a key component of effective change management. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Which of the following is true about ‘selective perception’ in communication?

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Laura is the Associate Director of a non-profit agency that provides assistance to children and families. She is the head of a department that focuses on evaluating the skill-building programs the agency provides to families. She reports directly to the agency leadership. As a whole, the agency has been cautious in hiring this year because of increased competition for federal grant funding. However, they have also suffered high staff turnover. Two directors have left as well as three key research staff and one staff person from the finance department. Laura has a demanding schedule that requires frequent travel; however, she supervises two managers who in turn are responsible for five staff members each. Both managers have been appointed within the last six months. Manager 1: Kelly has a specific background in research. She manages staff who provide research support to another department that delivers behavioural health services to youth. Kelly supports her staff and is very organized; however, she often takes a very black-and-white view of issues. Upper-level leadership values Kelly’s latest research on the therapeutic division’s services. Kelly is very motivated and driven and expects the same from her staff. Manager 2: Linda has a strong background in social science research and evaluation. She manages staff that work on different projects within the agency. She is known as a problem solver and is extremely supportive of her staff. She is very organized and has a wealth of experience in the evaluation of family services. Linda is very capable and can sometimes take on too much. The managers are sensing that staff are becoming overworked as everyone takes on increased responsibilities due to high staff turnover. Staff have also mentioned that Laura’s “glass half-empty” conversation style leaves them feeling dejected. In addition, Laura has not shared budgets with her managers, so they are having difficulty appropriately allocating work to staff. Laura said she has not received sufficient information from the finance department to complete the budgets. The finance department said they have sent her all the information they have available. As staff become distressed, the managers are becoming frustrated. They feel like they are unable to advocate for their staff or problem-solve without key information like the departmental budget.

Read the case study, then answer the given subquestions CASE INCIDENT Negative Aspects of Collaboration? Teams can perform well or poorly, which leaves an overriding question: Are collaboration's negative aspects so severe that we should avoid making decisions and working in teams? Groups and teams need more time to process multiple pieces of information and coordinate what they know. Daniel Kahneman (Israeli-American psychologist, who was awarded the 2002 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences) and colleagues also warn that when committees and groups make recommendations, they’ve often “fallen in love” with a particular idea and are no longer thinking rationally. These problems of biases can be magnified when a team of people are making a decision collectively. Look no further than the U.S. Congress in recent years to see instances where a group decision-making process might lead to a worse outcome than if one consistent course of action were pursued. So what can be done to minimize these biases? The problems of coordination and collaboration suggest that we should invoke team decision-making only when it appears that pooling information will lead to better decisions than individual decision-making. Experts advise that decision-makers receiving advice from teams should always ask whether the team’s recommendations contain any self-interested biases. It’s also important to see whether the team has developed an emotional attachment to one course of action or has succumbed to groupthink. Finally, run down a checklist of the heuristics and biases related to group shifts and groupthink to see whether the group might be prone to making these decision errors.